Hoka Challenger 7 VS Speedgoat 5: What Should I Buy?

The Hoka One One Challenger 7 and Speedgoat 5 are both popular trail running shoes from Hoka One One. However, they are designed for slightly different purposes.
The Challenger 7 is best for moderate trails and all-around training, while the Speedgoat 5 is ideal for technical terrain and ultramarathon distances. This in-depth comparison will highlight the key similarities and differences to help you choose which model is better for your needs.
Similarities And Differences Between Hoka Challenger 7 And Speedgoat 5:
Feature | Challenger 7 | Speedgoat 5 |
---|---|---|
Launched In | 2023 | 2022 |
Stability | Moderate | Moderate |
Flexibility | Moderate | Moderate |
Sizing | Men’s 7-13, Women’s 5-11 | Men’s 7-13, Women’s 5-11 |
Weight | 9.3 oz (men’s) | 10.76 oz (men’s) |
Cushion | High | Maximal |
Outsole | Vibram® Megagrip with 5mm lugs | Vibram® Megagrip with 5mm lugs |
Midsole | PROFLYTM dual-density foam | CMEVA foam |
Upper | Engineered mesh | Double-layer engineered mesh |
Retail Price | $145 | $155 |
Features Comparison:
Materials:
The Challenger 7 uses an engineered mesh upper with minimal layers for breathability. The Speedgoat 5 has a double-layer engineered mesh upper for added durability and protection.

CHALLENGER 7

SPEEDGOAT 5
Both shoes use Vibram® Megagrip rubber in the outsole for traction, but they differ in the midsole foam. The Challenger 7 uses PROFLYTM dual-density foam while the Speedgoat 5 uses CMEVA foam for maximum cushioning.
Durability:
The Challenger 7 is built to last for around 300-500 miles. The engineered mesh upper is fairly durable, and the Vibram® outsole rubber provides good wear resistance.
The Speedgoat 5 has excellent durability with a double-layer upper and Vibram® outsole. It can withstand 500+ miles of wear and tear. The Speedgoat 5 edges out the Challenger 7 when it comes to longevity.
Fit:
The Challenger 7 runs true to size for most runners and has a more customizable, secure fit from the flat laces and inner sleeve construction.

CHALLENGER 7 TOP VIEW

SPEEDGOAT 5 TOP VIEW
The Speedgoat 5 also runs true to size but some find it has a wider fit, especially in the toe box area. The Speedgoat 5 may not work as well for runners with narrow feet. Overall, the Challenger 7 accommodates more foot shapes.
Stability:
Both shoes provide moderate stability without being overly controlling. The Challenger 7 gets some stability from the slightly wider base, foam sidewalls, and medial post.
The Speedgoat 5 relies on the flat base and upper construction to provide a stable platform without posting. For those needing some pronation control, the Challenger 7 is the better option.
Cushioning:
The Speedgoat 5 has thicker, plusher cushioning than the Challenger 7. The CMEVA foam midsole gives it a soft, cushioned ride that works well for ultramarathons.
The Challenger 7 has a moderately cushioned PROFLYTM foam that balances support and responsiveness. For maximum cushioning, the Speedgoat 5 is superior. But the Challenger 7 still provides plenty of cushion for long runs.
Value For Money:
At $155, the Speedgoat 5 costs around $10 more than the Challenger 7. Both deliver excellent value with long-lasting construction and comfortable cushioning systems.
The Speedgoat 5 justifies the slightly higher price with its durable upper and thicker cushioning that performs well over ultramarathon distances. But both represent a good value for versatile trail shoes.
Performance Comparision:
For Walking:
The Challenger 7 and Speedgoat 5 both perform well for walking, thanks to the comfortable cushioning. The Challenger 7 may work slightly better for leisurely walks.
Its moderate cushioning feels lively and responsive at walking paces, while also providing protection underfoot. The Speedgoat 5 feels overly cushioned at slower paces.
For Running:
For moderate trail runs, the Challenger 7 gets the edge with its balanced cushioning and secure fit. But for ultramarathon distances and technical terrain, the Speedgoat 5 is superior. Its thicker cushioning absorbs impact over many miles, and the deep lugs provide traction on varied surfaces.
For Plantar Fasciitis:
The Speedgoat 5 is the better choice for plantar fasciitis with its plush cushioning under the heel. The raised heel crash pad also helps absorb impact with each step. While also cushioned, the Challenger 7 may not provide enough shock attenuation for painful inflammation.
For Standing All Day:
With their comfortable cushioning and moderate arch support, both models work for extended standing. The Speedgoat 5 has a slight advantage with its plusher midsole that stays resilient even after hours on your feet. But the Challenger 7 also cushions and supports well for long periods of standing.
Final Verdict:
For moderate trails and all-around training, the Hoka Challenger 7 is the better pick with its secure fit, lively cushioning, and reasonable price.
But the Speedgoat 5 takes the lead for technical ultramarathons and challenging terrain thanks to its durable construction, maximum cushioning, and enhanced outsole traction.
Choose the Hoka Speedgoat 5 if you primarily run ultramarathons, long distances, or very rocky trails. For shorter to mid-range trail runs on moderate terrain, select the well-balanced Hoka Challenger 7.