When it comes to premium running shoes, Hoka One One is a brand that consistently delivers. With a wide range of shoe models to choose from, runners can find a Hoka shoe well-suited for their needs.

Two of Hoka One One’s most popular neutral cushioned trainers are the Rincon 2 and the Clifton 7. Both shoes provide responsive cushioning and lightweight comfort, but they differ in their overall feel and ideal use cases.

This in-depth comparison of the key features and real-world performance of the Hoka Rincon 2 versus the Clifton 7 will help you decide which model is the better choice for you.

Materials:

The Rincon 2 uses a compression-molded EVA midsole foam which provides a firm, responsive feel underfoot. The engineered mesh upper is highly breathable. The meta-rocker outsole ensures a smooth transition from heel to toe.

The Clifton 7 has a softer EVA midsole foam for maximum cushioning and shock absorption. It shares the breathable mesh upper and meta-rocker outsole design of the Rincon 2.

Durability:

The Rincon 2 holds up well for around 300 miles for the average runner. The firmer foam may lose some responsiveness over time. The outsole rubber also shows reasonable durability for high-mileage training.

The Clifton 7 generally lasts slightly longer, with some runners getting over 400 miles out of a pair. The softer foam retains cushioning for more miles before breaking down. The outsole rubber remains durable even at higher mileage.

Fit:

The Rincon 2 runs true to size for most runners. It has a comfortable, sock-like fit in the upper. The moderate heel counter provides a secure lockdown. Some may find the toe box to be on the narrower side.

The Clifton 7 has a roomier forefoot and toe box while still providing a snug heel and midfoot fit. It accommodates wider feet better than the Rincon 2. The padded tongue and collar enhance comfort.

Stability:

The Rincon 2 is a neutral shoe with little inherent stability. The firm midsole gives it a stable, balanced feel at moderate speeds. At faster paces, some runners notice it feeling wobbly laterally.

The Clifton 7 ‘s softer foam compresses more, reducing stability slightly. The early-stage meta-rocker helps guide the foot through the gait cycle. Overall, both shoes are best for neutral runners not needing correction for overpronation.

Cushioning:

The Rincon 2 has a moderate cushioning level that provides responsive shock absorption without excessive softness. The compression-molded midsole foam delivers an energetic rebound.

The Clifton 7 maximizes cushioning with its soft, thick midsole foam. This gives it a plush, pillowy feel underfoot. The cushioning absorbs impact comfortably over long distances.

Value For Money:

The Rincon 2 delivers impressive responsiveness and lightweight comfort at a more affordable $131 price point. The Clifton 7 costs slightly more at $170 but offers superior cushioning and comfort for high mileage training and all-day wear.

Choose the Rincon 2 to save money without sacrificing performance and choose the Clifton 7 if maximum cushioning is your top priority.

For Walking:

The Rincon 2‘s responsive sole feels quite firm when walking slowly. The low flexibility in the forefoot reduces natural foot bending. The Clifton 7 has better walking comfort with its softer cushioning. Its smoother heel-to-toe transition caters better to casual walking gaits.

For Running:

As a versatile neutral trainer, the Rincon 2 balances cushioning, flexibility, and snappy responsiveness over middle distances to marathon races.

The Clifton 7 has plusher cushioning to soften hard impacts but loses some snappy speed over faster efforts. It shines for high mileage training and long-distance comfort.

For Plantar Fasciitis:

The Rincon 2’s lower profile and firmer cushioning give adequate arch support for mild plantar fasciitis. However, runners needing more enhanced support may find the Clifton 7 better for reducing heel and arch pain. Its deep cushioning and smooth transition relieve pressure on the plantar fascia.

For Standing All Day:

The Rincon 2 offers less all-day comfort than the Clifton 7 if you’ll be on your feet for extended periods. The Clifton 7‘s plush cushioning absorbs shock and reduces fatigue better with its softer foam and flexible transition. For prolonged standing, the Clifton 7 is the clear winner.

Final Verdict:

The Hoka Rincon 2 and Clifton 7 share similarities like breathable mesh uppers and meta-rocker outsoles. The key difference lies in the cushioning. With its responsive, firmer ride, the Rincon 2 suits faster running and races for neutral runners.

The maximally cushioned Clifton 7 offers superior comfort for long, easy mileage days. It also works better for walking, plantar fasciitis, and all-day use.

Choose the Rincon 2 if you want a lightweight, low-profile trainer/racer. Go with the Clifton 7 for softness and shock absorption when comfort is your priority. Either way, you can’t go wrong with these two excellent neutral shoes from Hoka!