Saucony vs ASICS: Which Is Better?

Saucony and ASICS are two of the most respected names in athletic footwear. Both brands offer high-quality shoes tailored for runners, with a focus on technologies that provide cushioning, stability and propulsion.

While they share some similarities, there are also distinct differences when it comes to fit, feel and performance. This comprehensive comparison overview will break down the pros and cons of each brand to help you decide if Saucony or ASICS is a better choice for your individual needs.

Comparison Table

Category Saucony ASICS
Founded 1898 1949
Comfort & Fit Roomy toe box, plush cushioning Snugger fit, rigid support
Color Options Wide range of colors More limited color options
Durability 500-800 miles lifespan 300-500 miles lifespan
Performance Flexible, responsive Stable, structured feel
Design & Style Retro and modern options Classic sporty aesthetic
Popularity Less mainstream appeal Globally popular brand
Best Selling Model Saucony Kinvara ASICS Gel-Kayano
Saucony Brand Overview:

Saucony has been crafting high-quality athletic shoes since 1898 when the brand was founded in Kutztown, Pennsylvania.

Known for their cushioned and supportive fit, Saucony running shoes are designed to provide versatility for runners of all levels.

They incorporate features like PWRRUN+ midsole foam, FORMFIT uppers, and Everun in the outsole to deliver a smooth, flexible ride.

Saucony offers a wide range of pronation control options like their neutral, stability, and motion control shoes.

Their shoes also accommodate different arch types with models featuring low to high arch support.

While the average price point is around $100, Saucony has options spanning from $55 for basic models to $275 for their top designs.

They have a classic, sleek aesthetic that works for athletic training as well as casual everyday use. Saucony is a brand with broad appeal across the running community.

One of their popular model Kinvara is a light, flexible shoe perfect for tempo runs and racing. For runners seeking a reliable, well-cushioned workhorse of a shoe, Saucony delivers quality and performance.

Asics Overview:

Asics was founded way back in 1949 by Kihachiro Onitsuka in Kobe, Japan.

The name “Asics” actually comes from the Latin phrase “anima sana in corpore sano,” which translates to “healthy soul in a healthy body.” Asics shoes really align with that mission, aiming to provide runners with equipment that enables peak performance.

Throughout its long history, Asics has continuously innovated and evolved its shoe technologies.

Key components that provide the renowned Asics fit and feel include the IGS (Impact Guidance System) for a natural gait cycle, Trusstic System tech for light stability, SpevaFoam cushioning for soft landings, and Dynamic DuoMax support for optimal alignment.

The outer soles utilize Asics’ specialized rubber compounds called AHAR (Asics High Abrasion Rubber) that hold up to heavy mileage on roads.

From fast, feather-light racing flats to well-cushioned trainers, Asics offers a diverse range of running shoe models to suit different needs.

But across the board, Asics shoes are known for their structured, classic look and feel.

If you want a running shoe with proven performance and durability from a brand that’s withstood the test of time, Asics is a solid choice.

Kihachiro Onitsuka

Major Differences Between The Brands:

Comfort And Fit:

Saucony shoes have a more spacious toe box and flexible upper material allowing your feet to relax and swell during runs. ASICS has a snugger fit through the midfoot and heel counter providing a secure lockdown feel.

Durability And Performance:

Both brands construct shoes to last 300-500 miles on average. Saucony tends to have more durable outsoles while ASICS focuses on retaining cushioning properties longer. In terms of performance, Saucony offers a softer, more flexible ride while ASICS aims for structure and stability.

Price:

ASICS edges out Saucony as the more affordable option on average. However, both brands offer shoes at entry-level, mid-range and high-end price points catering to different budgets.

Design And Style:

Saucony has more lifestyle-oriented shoes with vintage styling along with sleek performance looks. ASICS has a sportier, traditional aesthetic overall but also offers some models in vibrant colors and prints.

Popularity:

ASICS is the clear frontrunner in global popularity and sales. However, Saucony enjoys an avid following among the American running community and specialty running stores.

Target Market:

Saucony targets injury-prone runners needing cushioning along with neutral runners preferring a natural flexible feel. ASICS caters to overpronators requiring stability and support during runs.

Performance Comparision:

For Nurses:

The cushioning technologies from both brands provide cushion and comfort for long shifts on your feet. Saucony’s roomier toe box may help alleviate pain from swelling over long hours. ASICS offers excellent support which is also beneficial for nursing needs.

For Walking:

Either shoe works well for walking with ample shock absorption. ASICS rigidity adds stability for longer treks while Saucony’s flexibility allows a smooth natural stride.

For Running:

Saucony excels for neutral runners with its cushioning and responsive heel-to-toe transition. ASICS is ideal for overpronators who benefit from its corrective guide system preventing excessive rolling of the foot.

For Flat Feet:

ASICS better accommodates flat feet with its strong arch support and stability features. Certain Saucony models do offer good arch support, but lean more towards a neutral platform.

For Back Pain:

Both provide technologies that reduce impact to relieve stress on the back. Saucony’s ample cushioning protects from jarring while ASICS rigid heel counter improves alignment and posture.

For Standing All Day:

The plush cushioning from both brands helps in jobs requiring long hours on your feet. Saucony may get a slight edge for comfort over extended periods.

For High Arches:

Saucony offers great shock absorption for high arches and its roomier toe box avoids squeezing arches. ASICS can work too with inserts added for arch support.

For Hiking:

ASICS trail running shoes provide excellent grip and stability over uneven terrain. Saucony also makes durable trail shoes but with more flexibility allowing natural foot movement.

For Plantar Fasciitis:

ASICS rigid support protects the plantar fascia from over-flexing and irritation. Saucony’s cushioning absorbs shock but its flexibility may aggravate the condition for some.

Final Verdict:

In the battle of Saucony versus ASICS, both brands make excellent performance shoes catering to different needs. ASICS takes the lead if you prefer stability, structure and support especially if you overpronate.

Saucony is ideal for those seeking a softer, flexible feel and ample cushioning. You can’t go wrong with either brand, but consider your specific fit preferences and running needs before deciding.

Whichever you choose, be sure to get properly fitted at a specialty running store for the best experience. With the proper pair of shoes, you’ll be off and running in comfort and style.

Leave A Comment